THE SOFT SCIENCE OF SUBLIMINAL SEDUCTION:
ARE YOU ATTRACTING OR MANIPULATING?
May, 26, 2025
by Mai El Mokadem
​​​
We live in a world where you can know pretty much everything about someone you’re into before you even speak to them. What they like. Their favorite coffee order. Which Spotify playlist they loop when they’re feeling existential. What cologne they wear. Thanks to social media, we’re all carrying neatly curated blueprints of people’s preferences — and consciously or not, a lot of us are using that information to get a little closer.
At first glance, it feels harmless. You find out he loves a particular band, and suddenly you casually mention you’ve “always loved” that band too. You pick up on how his ex used to style her hair and you subtly try a similar parting. You start texting in his slang, mirroring the same little phrases, the same emoji ratio. You laugh at the same inside jokes that — let’s be honest — weren’t inside jokes for you five minutes ago.
But is it cute? Is it clever? Or is it kind of manipulative?
According to Google, “subliminal seduction in dating refers to the idea of using subtle, subconscious cues and messages to influence a person's attraction or interest, often without their conscious awareness.” It can be verbal, body-language-dependent, visual, or auditory. Scientists have long studied the role of subliminal cues in human attraction. A 2021 study published in Nature Human Behaviour found that people may be influenced by non-conscious mimicry and familiarity when evaluating potential partners, even small subconscious cues can trigger a sense of safety and connection.
This is tied to what psychologists call the “mere exposure effect”: the more we’re exposed to something, even subliminally, the more we tend to like or trust it. Basically, we like what we’re familiar with. The brain feels safe around things it recognizes, and that safety can translate into attraction. Meghan Markle famously admitted she wore Princess Diana’s favorite perfume when she first met Prince Harry. It wasn’t a coincidence; it was a subliminal cue of familiarity.
Princess Kate? Her mother reportedly convinced her to defer a year so she’d be in the same class as Prince William at university — positioning, quite literally. Whether they consciously calculated these moves or not, the effect is the same: plant seeds of comfort, build a sense of belonging.
This is where things start to split into levels. On one hand, mirroring is part of human bonding — we subconsciously mirror people we like all the time. On the other hand, when you’re deliberately manufacturing familiarity based on data mining someone’s interests, the line between “flirting” and “emotional hacking” starts to blur.
​
You know that eerie feeling when you meet someone new but something about them just feels oddly familiar? That’s not random. It might be your brain responding to a pile of micro-cues it can’t fully articulate; scent, phrasing, even the way they move their hands. A 2020 study titled ‘Subliminal determinants of cue-guided choice’ by Sara Garofalo in Scientific Reports found that when people were exposed to reward-paired cues below conscious awareness, it still made them gravitate toward similar rewards, even if they couldn’t name or identify the cue itself. It’s like your subconscious brain is scanning for echoes of old pleasure signals, while your conscious brain just thinks you “vibe” with someone.
This study shows that when your brain has previously paired certain cues (a voice tone, a perfume, a texting style) with a rewarding emotional experience (love, lust, attachment), just being around similar cues later can nudge you toward positive feelings again — even if you don’t consciously realize why. Of course, when people intentionally recreate those cues (wearing a certain perfume, mimicking a texting style, referencing shared interests they stalked online), they’re essentially hacking your brain’s reward associations.
Social media has turned all of this into a strategic playground. You don’t need to casually get to know someone anymore. You can scroll back through their posts, see what brands they like, what their ex looked like, what books they share quotes from, and which “healed girl era” they’re currently in. You can tailor your entire vibe to fit what you know they already like.
It’s no longer just charm — it’s optimization. A performance. With access to someone’s Spotify playlists, Instagram saves, and old tweets, the act of mirroring someone’s tastes becomes less about fate and more about finely curated algorithms. Some experts even refer to this as “data-driven romantic manipulation” — when technology fuels hyper-targeted courting tactics that feel natural, but are deeply engineered. And the question becomes: are you actually compatible, or are you just hyper-customizing your personality for a better conversion rate?
And then we get to the more… visceral side of subliminal attraction, and the rise of pheromone perfumes. Pheromone perfumes are fragrances designed to mimic or enhance the body’s natural chemical signals, which some scientists believe play a role in sexual attraction and social communication. In nature, pheromones are chemical messengers animals (including humans) release to influence the behavior or physiology of others, subconsciously.
​
The idea behind pheromone perfumes is that by adding synthetic versions of these compounds—like androstadienone (found in male sweat) or estratetraenol (linked to female pheromones)—the wearer may become more subtly attractive or appealing to others on a chemical level. Essentially, they’re marketed as a shortcut to trigger subconscious attraction or increase perceived desirability without people even realizing why they feel drawn to you.
This intersects with our olfactory system. While the science on commercial pheromone perfumes is still debated, one study in Neuroendocrinology Letters found that certain compounds (like androstadienone) can elevate mood and focus in women subconsciously.
The idea is primal: trigger someone’s subconscious biological instincts, hack their lizard brain. There’s even some scientific basis to how scent influences attraction — research shows that body odor can affect mate selection, but studies mostly apply to natural, unforced situations. Once you start orchestrating it with lab-made pheromone sprays or some rather intimate DIY tricks involving smearing yourself on your neck (yes… unfortunately that is a thing)? Now we’re entering performative primality; a curated, borderline theatrical version of instinct.
Here’s where it gets messy. Neurotypical brains are wired to respond to patterns and familiarity — it’s why marketing works, why nostalgia works, why certain songs make us feel safe. So technically, you are influencing someone’s subconscious. The real question is: what’s your intention?
If you’re using subliminal techniques to highlight shared interests, build rapport, and spark a connection — it’s a little iffy, but fine. If you’re morphing into a custom version of yourself that only exists to bait someone into attachment? That’s not flirting; that’s fraud. You’re not building intimacy; you’re constructing a character based on their algorithm.
At its worst, this tactic can feed into anxious attachment patterns, creating fast, fake intimacy that feels intense but ultimately unsustainable. The risk is, once the mask slips (because it always eventually does), you’re left with someone who fell for a version of you that never really existed. And you have to ask yourself: was the connection ever real?
We’re all a little performative in dating — everyone wants to present the best version of themselves. But as our access to other people’s data gets easier, the ethical lines get fuzzier. At what point does “I wore this perfume because I heard you like it” shift into “I researched your entire dating history to algorithmically craft a version of me you’ll find irresistible”?
​
That’s the modern dilemma of dating in the data age. Are you bonding, or are you branding? In the end, it might be worth returning to the most unsexy word of all: authenticity. You can only sustain a version of yourself that you actually are. And trust me, no amount of scented neck dabbing will fix a bond built on algorithmic seduction.